The NYT has never bothered to report that the current Commander in Chief could not qualify for even a low level security clearance. Nobody needs to know that. Nor did they find Obama’s murky past and lifetime of associations with radicals and known communists to be newsworthy. Nope. Nothing consequential about any of that. Just idle gossip, that was. McCarthyism, guilt by association and all that. (For the record, McCarthy was right).
Ninety-one thousand pages of classified war documents–that’s the news that’s fit to print at the Treason Times. The NYT has been causing colossal deforestation in its efforts to undermine national security since 9/11.
The NYT rules on what the news is today and the rest of the ovine media take their cues. Note the Times’ naked confession of treason (HT Michelle Malkin):
Information that is marked ‘secret’ has been determined to be information or material that the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause ‘serious damage’ to the national security.
All the more reason to publish it if your goals are aligned with our enemies. There is always a delicate balance between the First Amendment and the people’s right to know what their government is doing. During a bloody war, the better part of valor means resolving doubt in favor of keeping classified documents classified for the time being.
Don’t fall for any faux indignation from Obama. He loves anything that makes our military or intelligence communities edgy. And his Red Press toadies are laying a foundation for premature withdrawal from Afghanistan.
One Comment
“The NYT has never bothered to report that the current Commander in Chief could not qualify for even a low level security clearance. ”
You’re good. The lead-in sentence is riveting and known to be true. Just too
damned bad that more of our voting citizenry didn’t realize this in the very beginning. If they had, we’d not be where we are today. Perhaps we’d be wise to understand that few of them had the intellect required to arrive at such a realization.
FD
One Trackback
[...] The NYT has never bothered to report that the current Commander in Chief could not qualify for even a low level security clearance. Nobody needs to know that. Nor did they find Obama’s murky past and lifetime of associations with radicals and known communists to be newsworthy. Nope. Nothing consequential about any of that. Just idle gossip, that was. McCarthyism, guilt by association and all that. [more...] [...]