Rapist Sees Imaginary Violence

Joy Tiz

©2010

 This is a legitimate thing to do, drawing parallels to the time running up to Oklahoma City and a lot of the political discord that exists in our country today

-Bill Clinton 

Dangerous Extremists

Patriotic Dissenters

Juanita Broderick:

“Clinton suddenly ‘turned me around and started kissing me, and that was a real shock. I first pushed him away. I just told him ‘no.’ . . . He tries to kiss me again. He starts biting on my lip. . . . And then he forced me down on the bed.  I just was very frightened. I tried to get away from him. I told him ‘no.’ . . . He wouldn’t listen to me.”

Ever on the lookout for an opportunity to restore his relevancy, Bill Clinton has joined the toxic choir on the left rabidly trying to equate the citizens in the Tea Party movement with deceased demented lone wolf Oklahoma bomber, Tim McVeigh.

“Clinton marked the upcoming 15th anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing on Friday with a major speech to the Center for American Progress, in which he warned that ‘the words we use really do matter, because there’s this vast echo chamber, and they go across space and they fall on the serious and the delirious alike. They fall on the connected and the unhinged alike.’” 

The Center for America Progress (CAP) is yet another tentacle of nefarious unrepentant Nazi collaborator, George Soros . 

Some of us are growing weary of being called violent, racist, homophobic extremists by the party of the KKK, Bull Connor, the SDS, Bill Ayers, the Weathermen, SEIU, the Black Panthers and a serial abuser of women.

If my recollection is correct, the actual Oklahoma bomber was executed under the aegis of a republican governor.

If Clinton really wants us to take that stroll down memory lane, we have to recall just how Clinton milked the tragedy for his own political gain.  In case anyone has forgotten, Byron York reminds us:

“What Clinton and his supporters do not talk about is the way in which Clinton, aided by pollster/adviser Dick Morris, exploited the bombing to make a political comeback from what was the lowest point in Clinton’s presidency to that time. (The Lewinsky scandal was still three years in the future.)  In the days after Oklahoma City, Clinton and Morris devised a plan to use the bombing to discredit and outmaneuver the new Republican majority in Congress. “

The first two years of the Clinton presidency were a disaster—not quite on the scale of the plague that is the Obama presidency—but bad enough to give the Republicans control of the House and Senate in 1994. 

“House Speaker Newt Gingrich and his GOP forces seized the initiative on virtually every significant issue, while Clinton appeared to be politically dead.  The worst moment may have come on April 18, the day before the bombing, when Clinton plaintively told reporters, ‘The president is still relevant here.’

Former Clinton pollster, Dick Morris counseled Clinton to use the Oklahoma City bombing against his Republican detractors:

“We hear so many loud and angry voices in America today whose sole goal seems to be to try to keep some people as paranoid as possible and the rest of us all torn up and upset with each other. They spread hate. They leave the impression that, by their very words, that violence is acceptable.”

As is always the case with the Clintons, everything old is new again:

“Later, under the heading ‘How to use extremism as issue against Republicans,’ Morris told Clinton that ‘direct accusations’ of extremism wouldn’t work because the Republicans were not, in fact, extremists.  Rather, Morris recommended what he called the ‘ricochet theory’. Clinton would ‘stimulate national concern over extremism and terror,’ and then, ‘when issue is at top of national agenda, suspicion naturally gravitates to Republicans.”  As that happened, Morris recommended, Clinton would use his executive authority to impose ‘intrusive’ measures against so-called extremist groups.”

No liberal can ever be accused of original thinking.  If they would  devote a fraction of the resources squandered on badgering innocuous private citizens toward defeating Islamic extremism, we would all be much safer:

“We cannot even say ‘Islamic’ and ‘terrorists’ in the same sentence! We cannot associate radical Islam with terrorism but the president can go out and Obama can go out and try to associate the tea party — genuine, peace-loving, middle-American citizens of this country — with future acts of terrorism? “ 

Hey Bill, if you want to cool things down–put some ice on it.