<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Devil Wears Purple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joytiz.com/2010/the-devil-wears-purple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joytiz.com/2010/the-devil-wears-purple/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 19:56:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://joytiz.com/2010/the-devil-wears-purple/comment-page-1/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 18:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joytiz.com/?p=2499#comment-2604</guid>
		<description>wow people sure are ridiculous. why the union has to get people to sign cards? because the labor board wont let just anyone just have a union. they have to see that enough people do want to see it happen. and of course those cards dont count as votes. they have to have an election because its what the law says about employees rights to form a union, once theres a majority then the workers can have a union, dont be misinformed by obvious people trying to make a buck by selling a book about a unions &quot;thug&quot; tactics. does tupac or snoop dogg work for seiu? dont think so. those are thugs. please people educate yourselves and make informed decisions before you start spouting off fox news politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow people sure are ridiculous. why the union has to get people to sign cards? because the labor board wont let just anyone just have a union. they have to see that enough people do want to see it happen. and of course those cards dont count as votes. they have to have an election because its what the law says about employees rights to form a union, once theres a majority then the workers can have a union, dont be misinformed by obvious people trying to make a buck by selling a book about a unions &#8220;thug&#8221; tactics. does tupac or snoop dogg work for seiu? dont think so. those are thugs. please people educate yourselves and make informed decisions before you start spouting off fox news politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://joytiz.com/2010/the-devil-wears-purple/comment-page-1/#comment-1254</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joytiz.com/?p=2499#comment-1254</guid>
		<description>Dear Anonymous,

If you truly believe what you have posted, and are not simply advancing your own agenda, then I fear you have an uninformed view of who the thugs really are. You mistake them for altruistic people standing for employee rights, when the true motives of many are nothing more than power and greed. It is also abundantly clear you have never read a neutrality agreement, or if you have, are naive as to the intent of the agreement and the extent union organizers will exert harassment, coercion and intimidation to achieve their goals!

Let&#039;s review some of the more onerous terms of a neutrality agreement:

1.)   The neutrality agreement eliminates any petition for a secret ballot election and resorts to recognition via card check.  Why would the unions seek to force a company to recognize a signature card, rather than engage in a private election? It should be obvious to any unbiased person the only reason this would be necessary is because the union knows it cannot win an election, and is determined to impose it&#039;s will through forced unionism. The secret ballot which we use in our government elections, and which is administered by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) for union recognition, is the only means of guaranteeing an uncorrupted election free of influence from either party. The Taft-Hartley Act  passed in 1947 instituted the secret ballot election following years of corruption, union intimidation and coercion of employees!  In our case we offered the SEIU the opportunity to have an election on many occasions, and in each instance they declined. Despite ruthless intimidation tactics used throughout the corporate campaign process in an attempt to force us to sign a neutrality agreement, the SEIU was only able to obtain 10 signatures out of 400 potential employees. 

Language from SEIU neutrality agreement: “Employer will not file a petition with the National Labor Relations Board for an election in connection with any demand for recognition by Union during the term of this Agreement.  By entering into this Agreement, Employer acknowledges that it has waived any right that it may have during the term of this Agreement to file a representation petition in response to nay demand for recognition by Union pursuant to this Agreement.” 

2.) The neutrality agreement requires the employer to provide, within five (5) business days of signing, a list of the names and addresses of all employees. Now lets use a little common sense. If the employees were the ones who were behind this initiative why would the union need their names and addresses? The answer is that the employees never invited the union. The union needs the information so they can send their thugs to peoples homes in order to intimidate them into signing union cards!

Language from SEIU neutrality agreement: “Upon Union’s request, Employer shall provide within five (5) business days a list of the names and addresses of all Employees within classifications subject to this Agreement.” 

3.) The neutrality agreement requires the employer to commence bargaining. If no agreement can be reached, the parties agree to participate in arbitration.: Why would the unions want this language? Because it guarantees them a contract! Remember that the National Labor Relations Act as it currently exists only requires employers to bargain, not to enter into an agreement!

Language from SEIU neutrality agreement: “The parties agree that any disputes . . . shall be submitted to expedited arbitration before an impartial arbitrator.”

The neutrality agreement is not just a means to approach employees, it is a means to forced unionism. The truth is unions as supported by NLRB statistics win about 64% of the elections. Company intimidation of employees is not the unions problem, because companies understand they need to take care of their employees and employees today have many government options such as the EEOC, DOL, NLRB and Wage and Hour to resolve grievances. In today&#039;s age the problem unions have is they have nothing to sell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Anonymous,</p>
<p>If you truly believe what you have posted, and are not simply advancing your own agenda, then I fear you have an uninformed view of who the thugs really are. You mistake them for altruistic people standing for employee rights, when the true motives of many are nothing more than power and greed. It is also abundantly clear you have never read a neutrality agreement, or if you have, are naive as to the intent of the agreement and the extent union organizers will exert harassment, coercion and intimidation to achieve their goals!</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s review some of the more onerous terms of a neutrality agreement:</p>
<p>1.)   The neutrality agreement eliminates any petition for a secret ballot election and resorts to recognition via card check.  Why would the unions seek to force a company to recognize a signature card, rather than engage in a private election? It should be obvious to any unbiased person the only reason this would be necessary is because the union knows it cannot win an election, and is determined to impose it&#8217;s will through forced unionism. The secret ballot which we use in our government elections, and which is administered by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) for union recognition, is the only means of guaranteeing an uncorrupted election free of influence from either party. The Taft-Hartley Act  passed in 1947 instituted the secret ballot election following years of corruption, union intimidation and coercion of employees!  In our case we offered the SEIU the opportunity to have an election on many occasions, and in each instance they declined. Despite ruthless intimidation tactics used throughout the corporate campaign process in an attempt to force us to sign a neutrality agreement, the SEIU was only able to obtain 10 signatures out of 400 potential employees. </p>
<p>Language from SEIU neutrality agreement: “Employer will not file a petition with the National Labor Relations Board for an election in connection with any demand for recognition by Union during the term of this Agreement.  By entering into this Agreement, Employer acknowledges that it has waived any right that it may have during the term of this Agreement to file a representation petition in response to nay demand for recognition by Union pursuant to this Agreement.” </p>
<p>2.) The neutrality agreement requires the employer to provide, within five (5) business days of signing, a list of the names and addresses of all employees. Now lets use a little common sense. If the employees were the ones who were behind this initiative why would the union need their names and addresses? The answer is that the employees never invited the union. The union needs the information so they can send their thugs to peoples homes in order to intimidate them into signing union cards!</p>
<p>Language from SEIU neutrality agreement: “Upon Union’s request, Employer shall provide within five (5) business days a list of the names and addresses of all Employees within classifications subject to this Agreement.” </p>
<p>3.) The neutrality agreement requires the employer to commence bargaining. If no agreement can be reached, the parties agree to participate in arbitration.: Why would the unions want this language? Because it guarantees them a contract! Remember that the National Labor Relations Act as it currently exists only requires employers to bargain, not to enter into an agreement!</p>
<p>Language from SEIU neutrality agreement: “The parties agree that any disputes . . . shall be submitted to expedited arbitration before an impartial arbitrator.”</p>
<p>The neutrality agreement is not just a means to approach employees, it is a means to forced unionism. The truth is unions as supported by NLRB statistics win about 64% of the elections. Company intimidation of employees is not the unions problem, because companies understand they need to take care of their employees and employees today have many government options such as the EEOC, DOL, NLRB and Wage and Hour to resolve grievances. In today&#8217;s age the problem unions have is they have nothing to sell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hammer</title>
		<link>http://joytiz.com/2010/the-devil-wears-purple/comment-page-1/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joytiz.com/?p=2499#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve over simplified the neutrality agreement . It exposes employees to coercion &amp; physical threats . SEIU has been known to &quot; assist &quot; people by filling out the ballots themselves . The country was built on secret ballot elections . If the Union is so certain that they are what is needed ; why not educate &amp; allow free choice ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve over simplified the neutrality agreement . It exposes employees to coercion &amp; physical threats . SEIU has been known to &#8221; assist &#8221; people by filling out the ballots themselves . The country was built on secret ballot elections . If the Union is so certain that they are what is needed ; why not educate &amp; allow free choice ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://joytiz.com/2010/the-devil-wears-purple/comment-page-1/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joytiz.com/?p=2499#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>Why do the generals of business inist on protraying themselves as heroes, the neutrality agreement simply means a right to approach the employee without the company thugs brainwashing and intimidating their employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do the generals of business inist on protraying themselves as heroes, the neutrality agreement simply means a right to approach the employee without the company thugs brainwashing and intimidating their employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Frederick</title>
		<link>http://joytiz.com/2010/the-devil-wears-purple/comment-page-1/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 02:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joytiz.com/?p=2499#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>I continue to find it fascinating how FEW people in this land give any thought, whenever there is an opportunity to exert selfcentered influence over someone else&#039;s existence, to that list of instructions called: The Ten Commandments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I continue to find it fascinating how FEW people in this land give any thought, whenever there is an opportunity to exert selfcentered influence over someone else&#8217;s existence, to that list of instructions called: The Ten Commandments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedNeckoBlogger</title>
		<link>http://joytiz.com/2010/the-devil-wears-purple/comment-page-1/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>RedNeckoBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joytiz.com/?p=2499#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>Union bosses have a LONG tradition of looting their pension and health care funds, now they are next in line for HUGE taxpayer bailouts (biyon$$$$).  So they can continue this practice, and continue LARGE kickbacks to their political toadies.   

&quot;I hate the company, they will fire you... but I fear the union, they will KILL you&quot;.  Unknown WV coal miner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Union bosses have a LONG tradition of looting their pension and health care funds, now they are next in line for HUGE taxpayer bailouts (biyon$$$$).  So they can continue this practice, and continue LARGE kickbacks to their political toadies.   </p>
<p>&#8220;I hate the company, they will fire you&#8230; but I fear the union, they will KILL you&#8221;.  Unknown WV coal miner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Mullennix</title>
		<link>http://joytiz.com/2010/the-devil-wears-purple/comment-page-1/#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Mullennix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joytiz.com/?p=2499#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>Unions are still perceived by far too many people as those of the early 19th century when workers were oppressed and having a union did mean you had a chance if you joined...but, in short order, the lure to the mob of all that dues money with so little cost of goods sold was too great and the unions were taken over...and so it goes to this day. 

Consider that the SEIU gets $10/week per member.  Now at over 2,000,000 members, that is $20 million each WEEK.  All collected and paid to them by their &#039;partners&#039;, the businesses they took over.  This is only possible when your other big partner is the political party you choose to pay to advance your cause with both direct contributionsnUNLIMITED, by the Democrats under the Disclosure Act.  

SEIU, Teamsters, UAW...all are in on the corruption and profiting greatly by it.  If you read one other book on the horrible cost and corruption entailed, PLUNDER by Steven Greenhut will richly inform you.  There, the cost of the Public Unions and their entanglement with the State politicos will or should, enrage you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unions are still perceived by far too many people as those of the early 19th century when workers were oppressed and having a union did mean you had a chance if you joined&#8230;but, in short order, the lure to the mob of all that dues money with so little cost of goods sold was too great and the unions were taken over&#8230;and so it goes to this day. </p>
<p>Consider that the SEIU gets $10/week per member.  Now at over 2,000,000 members, that is $20 million each WEEK.  All collected and paid to them by their &#8216;partners&#8217;, the businesses they took over.  This is only possible when your other big partner is the political party you choose to pay to advance your cause with both direct contributionsnUNLIMITED, by the Democrats under the Disclosure Act.  </p>
<p>SEIU, Teamsters, UAW&#8230;all are in on the corruption and profiting greatly by it.  If you read one other book on the horrible cost and corruption entailed, PLUNDER by Steven Greenhut will richly inform you.  There, the cost of the Public Unions and their entanglement with the State politicos will or should, enrage you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://joytiz.com/2010/the-devil-wears-purple/comment-page-1/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joytiz.com/?p=2499#comment-1073</guid>
		<description>David Bego is a true American Hero. I hope his book is read by every single person who believes in free enterprise and capitalism. You will need his philosophy and principled application of his values in order to be as successful as he.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Bego is a true American Hero. I hope his book is read by every single person who believes in free enterprise and capitalism. You will need his philosophy and principled application of his values in order to be as successful as he.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

